Archives

The impact of parental intimate partner abuse on young adult relationships

    Intimate partner violence and abuse (IPVA) has the potential to be physically and psychologically damaging across generations. Childhood exposure to IPVA may place young people at greater risk of IPVA within their own relationships. It is estimated that a quarter of UK adults have grown up in a household where parental IPVA has taken place.

    The research team, including VISION Director Professor Gene Feder and led by Dr Annie Herbert (University of Bristol), aimed to provide estimates for the relationship between IPVA among mothers, and IPVA in their children’s own relationships as young adults.

    They studied the intergenerational effects of prospectively-reported IPVA in a UK general population birth cohort and examined effects according to different subtypes of maternal IPVA victimisation (psychological [and to an extent, controlling behaviours], and physical) and young adult IPVA victimisation and perpetration (psychological [including controlling behaviours], physical, and sexual). This is the first prospective longitudinal study on intergenerational effects of IPVA in the UK.

    The researchers found a modest association between maternal IPVA (partner-to-mother victimisation) and IPVA victimisation among their children as young adult women, and between maternal IPVA and IPVA perpetration in young adult men.  After adjusting for potential confounding factors, the association for victimisation among women lessened, but a weak positive association for perpetration among young men remained. This finding was consistent with some previous reviews of studies on intergenerational effects of IPVA. The strongest association was for perpetration by men growing up around physical IPVA victimisation.

    The findings showed that maternal IPVA victimisation is responsible for up to 10% of cases of IPVA in young adult relationships, largely concentrated amongst young people who experienced complex adversity including child maltreatment. Services supporting domestic violence cases in families should consider wider trauma, including history of child maltreatment.

    To download: The impact of parental intimate partner violence and abuse (IPVA) on young adult relationships: a UK general population cohort study – The Lancet Regional Health – Europe

    To cite: The impact of parental intimate partner violence and abuse (IPVA) on young adult relationships: a UK general population cohort study. Herbert, Annie et al. The Lancet Regional Health – Europe, Volume 0, Issue 0, 101278

    For further information, please contact Annie at annie.herbert@bristol.ac.uk

    Photograph from Adobe Photo Stock subscription

    The economic burden of child maltreatment and co-occurring parental domestic violence and abuse in the UK

      Child maltreatment (CM) and parental domestic violence and abuse (pDVA) impose considerable lifelong adverse outcomes on those affected. Approximately 8.5 million adults in England and Wales are estimated to have been exposed to CM (physical, sexual or emotional abuse or emotional or physical neglect of a child by a parent or caregiver) before their 16th birthday. Despite sharing multiple family and environmental risk factors, the economic burden of child exposure where they co-occur has not previously been estimated in detail.

      VISION researcher Professor Gene Feder estimated average lifetime societal costs resulting from CM or childhood exposure to pDVA, and incremental costs for scenarios where they co-occur with lead researcher Dr Kevin Gilbert at the University of Cambridge and others.

      The findings showed that lifetime costs for childhood exposure to CM and/or pDVA, were £71,309 per child (non-fatal exposure), and £1,292,377 per CM fatality, with £27.8 billion projected costs (2013 UK birth cohort).

      Total costs for exposure to pDVA alone was £1.0 billion (£16,639 per child exposed), rising to £2.0 billion (£71,037 per exposed child) for children reporting awareness of pDVA. Co-occurring CM and pDVA imposed greater costs than either alone, including costs from child perpetration of intimate partner violence.

      As a result of the research the team concluded that CM and/or pDVA exposure incurs large personal and societal economic burdens. Costs from both pDVA exposure and intergenerational transmission of IPV perpetration highlight the importance for policies to address both CM and domestic violence and abuse in affected households.

      Given the scale of burden accrued over the life course after CM and/or pDVA exposure, this model can provide a framework upon which policy makers can identify the best use of resources to maximise the societal benefits from the effective interventions needed to tackle a complex social issue.

      To download the article: The economic burden of child maltreatment and co-occurring parental domestic violence and abuse in the UK

      To cite: Herbert K, Feder G, Gilbert R, Powell C, Howarth E, Morris S. The economic burden of child maltreatment and co-occurring parental domestic violence and abuse in the UK. Child Abuse Negl. 2025 Mar 31;163:107435. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2025.107435. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 40168916.

      For further information, please contact Kevin at kch28@medschl.cam.ac.uk

      Illustration from Adobe Photo Stock subscription

      Adverse childhood experiences in firstborns associated with poor mental health of siblings

        Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) often affect multiple children within families, yet studies tend to focus on the health outcomes of individual children, underestimating the needs of affected families. First author Dr Shabeer Syed (UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health), VISION Director and Professor Gene Feder, and colleagues aimed to examine the association between firstborns exposed to ACEs between 1 year before and 2 years after birth (the first 1000 days) and the risks of mental health problems, mental health-related health-care contacts, and all-cause hospital admissions in multiple children from the same mother, compared to firstborns without ACEs.

        The first-of-its-kind study, published in The Lancet Public Health and funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Policy Research Programme, found that mothers whose firstborns had experienced adverse childhood experiences had a 71% increased risk of having children (aged five -18) with mental health problems, compared to mothers whose firstborn did not experience adversity.

        This translates to 12 additional children with mental health problems for every 100 mothers whose firstborn experienced adversity.

        These findings underscore the pervasive risk that early adversity can have on multiple children in the family, and the importance of early identification and sustained support for vulnerable families beyond the first 1,000 days of a child’s life.

        As part of the study, researchers analysed linked GP and hospital health records from 333,048 first-time mothers and their 534,904 children (firstborns and siblings) born in England between 2002 and 2018. They focused on six different forms of adverse childhood experiences in the firstborn child recorded during their first 1,000 days of life (from conception up until the age of two).

        These included: child maltreatment, intimate partner violence, maternal substance misuse, maternal mental health problems, adverse family environments (e.g. homelessness), and high-risk presentations of child maltreatment (e.g. unexplained child injuries).

        Over a third (37.1%) of firstborn children had at least one recorded adverse childhood experience. The most common adverse childhood experiences were living with maternal mental health problems (21.6%), followed by adverse family environments (14.5%) such as parental criminality and housing instability.

        Approximately one in five (19.8%) mothers had at least one child with a recorded mental health problem between the ages of 5 and 18.

        The risk of mental health problems was consistent across all siblings, regardless of birth order (firstborn vs thirdborn), in families where the firstborn experienced adverse childhood experiences.

        Lead author Dr Syed said: “Whilst previous research has focused on the impact of adverse childhood experiences on individual children, our study reveals a cascading health risk that extends beyond the individual, impacting on the health of siblings as well.

        “This likely stems from the continuation of adverse childhood experiences within the family. When a child or parent presents with mental health concerns, violence or other forms of adversity, it’s essential to ask about the wider family context.”

        As a result of their findings, the team are also calling for further research into the impact of early health visiting and primary care support.

        Co-author, Professor Feder, said: “General practice teams have a key role in identifying first-born children experiencing adverse childhood experiences and in supporting first-time parents to help reduce the impact of adverse childhood experiences on the whole family, including subsequent children.

        “We need further evidence for effective interventions to reduce that impact, particularly on mental health.”

        Study limitations

        The researchers could not investigate adverse childhood experiences related to fathers’ mental health or substance use as healthcare data from fathers could not be linked to their children.

        The study found that adverse childhood experiences in firstborns were associated with mental health outcomes in the first and subsequent children, but this does not necessarily mean that adverse childhood experiences cause mental health problems.

        Additionally, electronic health-care records underestimate intimate partner violence and child maltreatment due to non-disclosure and/or detection and under-recording by clinicians.

        To download the paper: Adverse childhood experiences in firstborns and mental health risk and health-care use in siblings: a population-based birth cohort study of half a million children in England – The Lancet Public Health

        Or for further information, please contact Shabeer at s.syed.16@ucl.ac.uk

        Illustration from Adobe Photo Stock subscription

        Gene Feder elected to the Academy of Medical Sciences’ Fellowship

          Professor Gene Feder OBE, Professor of Primary Care at the Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, and the VISION Director, was recently elected to the Academy of Medical Sciences’ esteemed Fellowship in part in recognition of his ground-breaking national and international research on domestic violence and abuse.

          Gene joins a respected Fellowship of approximately 1,400 researchers working alongside the Academy to influence research and health policy in the UK and worldwide.

          The Academy is the independent, expert body representing the diversity of medical science in the UK. Its mission is to advance biomedical and health research and its translation into benefits for society. The Academy’s elected Fellows are the most influential scientists in the UK and worldwide, drawn from the NHS, academia, industry and the public service.

          The VISION consortium congratulates Gene on this prestigious accolade.

          For further information, please see: 2024: Professor Gene Feder elected to the Academy of Medical Sciences Fellowship | Centre for Academic Primary Care | University of Bristol